A proper Christmas present please

Allowing land speculation is what makes homes unaffordable.

It’s a choice.

One much favoured by those keen to continue extracting socially produced wealth at the expense of those who do not own sites.

For Christ’s sake let’s get AGR/LVT up the political agenda in 2019.

People’s Budget No. 2: The Scottish Budget


The distortions affecting society and the economy from Wednesday’s Scottish budget are considerable and avoidable.

What is the public pricing mechanism that would render budgetary expenditures self-funding, so that the money does not have to be added to the tax burden of people working in Scotland?

In pursuing land reform, the Scottish government required The Scottish Land Commission to investigate the effectiveness of LVT around the world. Unfortunately the report by experts at the University of Reading is seriously flawed.

In People’s Budget No. 2 economist Fred Harrison explains why.

SLRG’s Professor Roger Sandilands talks to Scottish Government economists on AGR/LVT

SLRG’s Professor Roger Sandilands’ presentation on AGR/LVT to Scottish Government employees on 19 October went well.

Here is Professor Sandilands’s 29-slide Powerpoint presentation. Edinburgh powerpoint presentation (r), Oct 2018

70 Scot Gov economists and other employees attended at the Victoria Quay building, with additional live streaming to two rooms in St Andrews House and a Glasgow venue.

It is hoped that the potential of AGR/LVT (economic rent as state revenue in place of taxes on wages and trade which repress wealth creation) to positively transform Scotland and share boosted prosperity, is now a little more widely understood.

Thanks to the event organisers, Spencer Thompson and Exploring Economics, an initiative in the Scottish Government aiming to promote a pluralistic approach to economics and to improve the understanding of economics among non-economists.

The Harrison Model

Are people killed being by misguided tax policies in 21st century Britain?

Explaining premature deaths by zone has been the subject of a lifetime of study by economist Fred Harrison www.sharetherents.org. For example, if you are a man living in Drumchapel you will die on average 17 years before men who live not far away in East Dunbartonshire.

Harrison’s economic model lays responsibility for the loss of up to an average 20 years of life, depending on where you happen to live, squarely at the feet of Government.

The cocktail of avoidable ill-effects of wrong tax policies is endured at higher levels by people living in marginal locations for the simple reason that arbitrary taxes cannot be afforded there. As a result they suffer disproportionately such effects as unemployment, the housing crisis, urban sprawl and figure disproportionately in the current self harm and mental ill-health epidemics. Harrison argues that the combined stresses of arbitrary taxation foment the horrifying and otherwise inexplicable statistics confronting us in daily news bulletins.

Yet the answer is a simple one. In Taxed to Death Fred Harrison and SLRG’s Professor Roger Sandilands explain the links and demonstrate how the benign and fair AGR tax reform would reverse each of these devastating trends and the annual death toll for which they are responsible.

The People’s Budget No. 1

The first of a new regular series of AGR commentaries from economist Fred Harrison of the Land Research Trust, designed by SLRG’s Ian Kirkwood, in which the interests of the peoples of the British Isles are at last placed centre stage.

When political power was devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland,
the politicians in Westminster failed to re-base tax policies in ways that would equalise people’s life chances across the UK. The Brexit crisis provides the opportunity for regional authorities to renegotiate the fiscal settlement.

A new language that favours inclusive justice must replace the old concepts that were designed to divide and rule. The adversarial language was used by Scotland’s finance secretary Derek Mackay when he informed the Financial Times this week that he could impose higher tax rates on the “richest” people (but not yet). Words like rich and wealth are toxic tools that distort public policy. They disguise the streams of income that ought to be taxed.

Some people get rich by working hard: they add value to people’s well-being,
and they are rewarded accordingly.

Others get rich without adding to anyone’s well-being. This activity is pure rent-seeking, the legacy of an obsolete parliamentary politics.

Why treat these two groups as identical for revenue purposes?

Under the fiscal philosophy that prevails in Westminster, London and the South-east will always fare better than people in other regions. Now is the time for all representative institutions to engage in discussion on how to revise the flow of revenue into the public’s purses to achieve equitable outcomes across the four nations of the UK.